Ace the Police Academy Case Law Challenge 2025 – Sharpen Your Legal Edge!

Question: 1 / 400

What did the Supreme Court rule in Nevada Department of Human Resources v. Hibbs?

It upheld the constitutionality of random drug testing.

It upheld provisions of the Family and Medical Leave Act affecting state employees.

In Nevada Department of Human Resources v. Hibbs, the Supreme Court ruled that provisions of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) affecting state employees were constitutional. The Court held that states could be sued for violating the FMLA, which aims to protect the rights of employees to take unpaid leave for specific family and medical reasons without fear of losing their job. This ruling underscored the importance of federal legislation in protecting workers' rights, affirming that the FMLA serves a significant public interest and that Congress had the authority to enforce these provisions against the states. As a result, the decision reinforced the ability of state employees to access the benefits offered under the FMLA, ensuring job protection during critical life events.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

It allowed for mandatory overtime for state employees.

It invalidated certain employee protections under state law.

Next Question

Report this question

Download Ace the Police Academy Case Law Challenge 2025 – Sharpen Your Legal Edge! PDF Study Guide
Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy